Never split an infinitive
The old claim turned out to be wrong and was rejected by evidence.
TaughtNever put a word between 'to' and its verb. "To boldly go" is an error, and it should be "to go boldly." Red pen.
NowEvery major usage authority now accepts split infinitives. Fowler defended them, the Chicago Manual of Style and Merriam-Webster call the prohibition unfounded, and the 2016 AP Stylebook explicitly permitted them. The rule was invented by nineteenth-century writers imitating Latin.
What actually happened
The origin is a category error about a different language. In Latin, the infinitive is one word, amare, so it is physically impossible to split. Nineteenth-century grammarians who treated Latin as the perfection of grammar concluded English should not do what Latin could not do, and the rule appeared in schoolbooks from the 1830s onward. English infinitives are two words. There is nothing to protect.
Good writers ignored it continuously. Split infinitives appear in Wycliffe, Chaucer, Donne, Samuel Johnson, Benjamin Franklin, Byron, and Henry James, meaning the construction predates the rule by five centuries. Fowler's Modern English Usage, the most conservative authority available, mocked the prohibition in 1926 and separated "those who neither know nor care" from "those who know and condemn," placing the latter in the wrong.
Avoiding the split often makes the sentence worse or changes the meaning. "He failed to completely understand" and "He failed completely to understand" say different things. Moving the adverb to dodge a fake rule can introduce a real ambiguity, and the Star Trek line is a decent argument all by itself: "to go boldly where no man has gone before" is limp.
Newsletter
Get new weekly revisions
Sources
- Merriam-Webster: Split Infinitivesmerriam-webster.com
- Chicago Manual of Style Online: Grammar and Usagechicagomanualofstyle.org
Who was taught this
Still standard through 2010, so anyone who finished school between 1950 and 1998 learned the earlier version.